For most of this page, we refer to Golubitsky and Guillemin for definitions etc. We always implictly endow with the Whitney topology.

Definition transversality of vector spaces

Assume We have two vectorsubspaces of some vector space . We write if .

Definition transversality of manifolds

Assume we have two submanifolds of some manifold . We write if for each (as vector spaces).

Definition 4.1. (p.50) Transversality

Let X, Y be smooth manifolds and be a smooth mapping. Let be a submanifold of and . Then intersects transversally at (denoted by at ) if either:

  1. , or
  2. , and (as vector spaces).

We write on if at . We leave the “on …” if intersects transversally on the entire .

Note that for the case were , the only way the function can intersect transversally is if .

For a definition when has a boundary, see Wikipedia.

Definition of corank

Let be differentiable manifolds and a map. Then we define:

We call a point a critical point of if , and we denote the set of critical points of by .

Definition 3.2 (p.44) residual set

Say we have a space . We then call a subset a residual set if is a countable intersection of dense open subsets of .

Exercise

  1. Assume we have two (k-differentiable) maps . We identify with . Show that (as manifolds) is a generic property of .

We note that means that .

Proof:

The most straightforward way to do this is with multijets.
  1. Show this implies the images of and (along the boundary) intersect in finitely many points, generically.

  2. Show that for three functions the generic case is no triple intersection.

Questions

  1. Is it true that for two smooth (-smooth?) manifolds that with the Whitney topology is a baire space? Or only in the case? (We discussed things on the board for , but in the book it only mentions )
  2. What is the intuition for allowing a countable amount of intersections in the definition of a residual set? This is fine in a Baire space, but does this break in other spaces? As in does this allow you to construct a generic property that does not hold on a dense subset of the space?